Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 57:578-a-579, April 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.578-a
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kanter, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kanter, J.
Related Collections
* Crisis and Emergency Treatment
* Hospitals, Hospital Treatment
* Violence in Treatment Settings

Letters

Clinical Case Management, Case Management, and ACT

To the Editor: The authors of the article "Comparison of ACT and Standard Case Management for Delivering Integrated Treatment for Co-occurring Disorders" (1) in the February issue use the misleading adjective "standard" to describe the comparison intervention. As described in the article, the "standard case management" used was actually a sophisticated "clinical case management team" (2,3,4) that provided multidisciplinary, integrated treatment with ongoing expert consultation. The clinical case managers had a larger caseload than the assertive community treatment team, and cases were assigned to individual case managers rather than to a team. However, even with these differences, the clinical case management approach used in the study has much in common with the assertive community treatment model.

Although one wishes that this type of treatment were "standard," case management today too often involves a poorly trained, paraprofessional staff operating apart from other treatment interventions (5). "Comparison of ACT and Clinical Case Management ..." would have been a more apt title for this informative article.

Joel Kanter, M.S.W., L.C.S.W.-C

Footnotes

Mr. Kanter is in private practice in Silver Spring, Maryland.

References

  1. Essock SM, Mueser KT, Drake RE, et al: Comparison of ACT and standard case management for delivering integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders. Psychiatric Services 57:185–196,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kanter J: Clinical case management: definition, principles, components. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 40:361–368,1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kanter J (ed): Clinical Studies in Case Management. New Directions in Mental Health Services, no 65. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1995
  4. Walsh J: Clinical Case Management With Persons Having Severe Mental Illness: A Relationship-Based Perspective. Belmont, Calif, Brooks/Cole, 2000
  5. Floersch, J: Meds, Money, and Manners: The Case Management of Severe Mental Illness. New York, Columbia University Press, 2002




This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kanter, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kanter, J.
Related Collections
* Crisis and Emergency Treatment
* Hospitals, Hospital Treatment
* Violence in Treatment Settings


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org