Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Ginsberg, P. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by Ginsberg, P. E.
Related Collections
* Other Ethics Issues
* Medical Records
Psychiatr Serv 50:417A-418, March 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Letter

Tailoring the Chart

Pauline E. Ginsberg, Ph.D.

To the Editor: I share the concerns expressed by Drs. Dwyer and Shih both for preserving social trust and for taking a long-term view of practice decisions that can impact not only on the individual in treatment but also on the system of care. Readers who are interested in looking at the issue from a somewhat different angle might want to read discussions by Garfinkle (1) and Ginsberg (2). They will find that selective recording practices are not a new phenomenon bred by the managed care environment, but a persistent problem in need of continued monitoring.

While it is (sadly) the case that some few practitioners construct patient records with the intent to defraud, it is my belief that most are concerned with the well-being of the persons under their care. Assuring that the patient's treatment needs are met, that maximum insurance coverage and minimal out-of-pocket expenses occur, and that the patient is protected from stigma are three short-term "good" reasons for making charting decisions of the kind noted by Dwyer and Shih, Garfinkle, and Ginsberg.

From this point of view, distortions in records are the result of short-sighted adaptations to the care environment and changes in that environment. To the extent that remediation is possible, the problem must be acknowledged by both payers and providers. Providers need to be reminded to take the long view of their charting behaviors. Payers and, for that matter, accrediting bodies must learn to anticipate the effects of their data demands on providers. This last is particularly urgent, as it is the providers' professionalism and expertise on which accrediting bodies ultimately depend.

Footnotes

Dr. Ginsberg is professor of psychology at Utica College of Syracuse University in Utica, New York.

References

  1. Garfinkle H: "Good" organizational reasons for "bad" clinic records, in Studies in Ethnomethodology. Edited by Garfinkle H. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1967
  2. Ginsberg PE: The dysfunctional effects of quantitative indicator production: illustrations from mental health care. Evaluation and Program Planning 7:1-12, 1984[Medline]




This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Ginsberg, P. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by Ginsberg, P. E.
Related Collections
* Other Ethics Issues
* Medical Records


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org