Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Huisman, A. Articles by Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Huisman, A. Articles by Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. Health Policy and Legislation Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines Suicide

An Examination of the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate's Supervision System for Suicides of Mental Health Care Users

Ms. Huisman and Dr. Kerkhof are affiliated with the Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam 1081BT, Netherlands (e-mail: a.huisman{at}psy.vu.nl). Dr. Robben is with the Health Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined characteristics of suicides among mental health care users reported between 1996 and 2006 to the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate and the inspectorate's follow-up responses. The aims were to determine whether follow-up was associated with particular characteristics and whether the responses could be improved in accordance with guidelines for treatment of suicidal patients. METHODS: Information about patient and treatment characteristics was collected from a sample of 505 of the 5,483 suicide notifications between 1996 and 2006. The 1996–2005 sample included an equal number of cases to which the inspectorate did and did not respond. The 2006 sample included the first 205 notifications in that year. RESULTS: For 2006 notifications the response rate was 37%. The responses most frequently addressed how and whether the suicide was evaluated and the adequacy of treatment for the psychiatric disorder. A follow-up response was more likely when the suicide involved a young patient or a patient treated in a mental health care setting for less than a year or when the notification was accompanied by the mental health institution's plans for improving its policies. A response was less likely when the patient was discharged from inpatient care in the three months before the suicide. Since 2002 responses have more frequently emphasized the importance of suicide risk assessment, in accordance with guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The inspectorate might improve its supervision system by placing greater emphasis on addressing suicidal impulses and treating older and chronically suicidal patients and patients soon after inpatient discharge.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Hubbeling Use of Guidelines in Suicide Prevention Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2009; 60(3): 405 - 405. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us