
Psychiatr Serv 60:108-111, January 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.1.108
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quality Improvement, Pay for Performance, and "Outcomes Measurement": What Makes Sense?
Benjamin Liptzin, M.D.
Dr. Liptzin is affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Tufts University School of Medicine, and Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut St., Springfield, MA 01199 (e-mail: benjamin.liptzin{at}bhs.org).
The author argues against the use of pay-for-performance programs based on broad-based measures of patient outcomes in behavioral health care. He describes various problems with such programs. The purpose for collecting data is often not clear. Generic instruments do not measure improvement in specific mental disorders. Risk adjustment systems for behavioral health populations are not adequate. Mandated use of different instruments by payers is burdensome and precludes meaningful comparisons. The methodology for using outcomes-based approaches needs further development, and therefore the data collected will have little utility. The author discusses alternative approaches.
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|