Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 58:844-847, June 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.844
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Byerly, M. J.
* Articles by Rush, A. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Byerly, M. J.
* Articles by Rush, A. J.
Related Collections
* Treatment Compliance
* Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
*Related Article

Article

Validity of Electronically Monitored Medication Adherence and Conventional Adherence Measures in Schizophrenia

Matthew J. Byerly, M.D., Ann Thompson, M.B.A., B.S.N., Thomas Carmody, Ph.D., Rhiannon Bugno, B.S., Thomas Erwin, B.S., Michael Kashner, J.D., Ph.D. and A. John Rush, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the validity of prescriber, patient, and research assistant ratings of adherence to prescribed oral antipsychotic medication among outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in comparison with electronic monitoring. METHODS: Adult outpatients with schizophrenia (N=35) or schizoaffective disorder (N=26) received adherence assessments via electronically monitored medication vial caps as well as by monthly prescriber, patient, and research assistant report for up to six months. RESULTS: Electronic monitoring detected greater nonadherence rates (57%) than either prescribers (7%) or patients (5%), though the research assistant ratings were 54%. No directional bias was found between electronic monitoring and assignment of adherence by research assistants, although disagreement occurred in 36% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and prescribers grossly overestimated medication adherence, which may interfere with or reduce the effectiveness of diligent medication management.


Related Article:

June 2007: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2007 58: 739. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. A. Chisholm-Burns and C. A. Spivey
Pharmacoadherence: A new term for a significant problem
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 1, 2008; 65(7): 661 - 667.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. I. Velligan, M. Wang, P. Diamond, D. C. Glahn, D. Castillo, S. Bendle, Y. W. F. Lam, L. Ereshefsky, and A. L. Miller
Relationships Among Subjective and Objective Measures of Adherence to Oral Antipsychotic Medications
Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 2007; 58(9): 1187 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org