Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 58:836-843, June 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.836
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by O'Reilly, R.
* Articles by Takhar, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by O'Reilly, R.
* Articles by Takhar, J.
Related Collections
* Rural and Underserved Patients
* Costs, Cost Analysis
* Access to Services
* Other Health Services Issues
* Computers, Telecommunications
*Related Article

Article

Is Telepsychiatry Equivalent to Face-to-Face Psychiatry? Results From a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial

Richard O'Reilly, M.B., F.R.C.P.C., Joan Bishop, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Karen Maddox, R.N., M.A., Lois Hutchinson, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Michael Fisman, M.B., F.R.C.P.C. and Jatinder Takhar, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.

OBJECTIVE: The use of interactive videoconferencing to provide psychiatric services to geographically remote regions, often referred to as telepsychiatry, has gained wide acceptance. However, it is not known whether clinical outcomes of telepsychiatry are as good as those achieved through face-to-face contact. This study compared a variety of clinical outcomes after psychiatric consultation and, where needed, brief follow-up for outpatients referred to a psychiatric clinic in Canada who were randomly assigned to be examined face to face or by telepsychiatry.METHODS: A total of 495 patients in Ontario, Canada, referred by their family physician for psychiatric consultation were randomly assigned to be examined face to face (N=254) or by telepsychiatry (N=241). The treating psychiatrists had the option of providing monthly follow-up appointments for up to four months. The study tested the equivalence of the two forms of service delivery on a variety of outcome measures. RESULTS: Psychiatric consultation and follow-up delivered by telepsychiatry produced clinical outcomes that were equivalent to those achieved when the service was provided face to face. Patients in the two groups expressed similar levels of satisfaction with service. An analysis limited to the cost of providing the clinical service indicated that telepsychiatry was at least 10% less expensive per patient than service provided face to face. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric consultation and short-term follow-up can be as effective when delivered by telepsychiatry as when provided face to face. These findings do not necessarily mean that other types of mental health services, for example, various types of psychotherapy, are as effective when provided by telepsychiatry.


Related Article:

June 2007: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2007 58: 739. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
D. Mucic
International telepsychiatry: a study of patient acceptability
J Telemed Telecare, July 1, 2008; 14(5): 241 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org