Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Ware, N. C. Articles by Fisher, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Ware, N. C. Articles by Fisher, D. Chronically Mentally Ill Patients Patient Advocacy Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life Other Psychiatric Rehabilitation Related Article

Connectedness and Citizenship: Redefining Social Integration

OBJECTIVE: Despite decades of deinstitutionalization, individuals with psychiatric disabilities living outside the hospital may be described as in the community, but not of it. To effectively address the persisting problem of social exclusion of persons with psychiatric disabilities, new conceptual tools are needed. To address this need, a new definition of social integration is offered. METHODS: The definition is based on data from a qualitative study. Data collection consisted of individual, unstructured interviews with 56 adults who have been psychiatrically disabled (N=78 interviews) as well as ethnographic visits to five service sites working to promote social integration for their users (N=8 visits). An interpretive approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Social integration is defined as a process, unfolding over time, through which individuals who have been psychiatrically disabled increasingly develop and exercise their capacities for connectedness and citizenship. Connectedness denotes the construction and successful maintenance of reciprocal interpersonal relationships. Social, moral, and emotional competencies are required to sustain connectedness. Citizenship refers to the rights and privileges enjoyed by members of a democratic society and to the responsibilities these rights engender. The definition calls for full rights and responsibilities of citizenship. CONCLUSIONS: The new definition sets an ideal, but not unrealistic, standard for social integration in the context of psychiatric disability. High standards encourage mental health professionals and policy makers to rethink what is possible for mental health services and to raise expectations for connectedness and citizenship among persons once disabled by mental illness.

Related Article:

April 2007: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2007 58: 441. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. K. Padgett and B. F. Henwood Obtaining Large-Scale Funding for Empowerment-Oriented Qualitative Research: A Report From Personal Experience Qual Health Res, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 868 - 874. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lamb Creating Change: Using the Arts to Help Stop the Stigma of Mental Illness and Foster Social Integration J Holist Nurs, March 1, 2009; 27(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. T. Young, C. A. Green, and S. E. Estroff New Endeavors, Risk Taking, and Personal Growth in the Recovery Process: Findings From the STARS Study Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2008; 59(12): 1430 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pilgrim `Recovery' and current mental health policy Chronic Illness, December 1, 2008; 4(4): 295 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. C. Ware, K. Hopper, T. Tugenberg, B. Dickey, and D. Fisher A Theory of Social Integration as Quality of Life Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2008; 59(1): 27 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us