Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 58:100-108, January 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.58.1.100
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Zuvekas, S. H.
* Articles by Norquist, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Zuvekas, S. H.
* Articles by Norquist, G.
Related Collections
* Costs, Cost Analysis
* Managed Care Programs
*Related Article

Article

Cost Shifting Under Managed Behavioral Health Care

Samuel H. Zuvekas, Ph.D., Agnes Rupp, Ph.D. and Grayson Norquist, M.D., M.S.P.H.

OBJECTIVE: The study examined whether a managed behavioral health care organization (MBHO) shifted treatment costs. METHODS: Four years of claims data (1991-1995) from an insurer that introduced an MBHO in 1992 to control treatment costs were analyzed. Although the MBHO was not at direct financial risk for specialty mental health treatment, it faced incentives related to reputation and contract renewal to shift costs to primary care treatment or prescription drugs. It was hypothesized that if cost shifting occurred, an increase would be noted in the use of psychotropic medications without concurrent use of specialty mental health treatment. Simple t tests and a generalized estimating equations probit specification were used to test this hypothesis. Separate tests were performed for use of any psychotropic medication, any newer antidepressant, and any stimulant in a large employer group that simultaneously implemented parity coverage (75,360 enrollees) and a group of smaller employers that did not (9,228 enrollees). RESULTS: The use of any psychotropic medication rose 64% in relative terms (p<.001) over the four-year period among enrollees of the large employer group and by 87% in the smaller groups (p<.001). In general, there were downward secular trends in the use of psychotropic medications without specialty care. Introduction of the MBHO was not significantly associated with the use of psychotropic medication alone. For newer antidepressants, introduction of the MBHO was associated in the large group with a 2.4 (p=.003) absolute percentage point decrease in medication use alone. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found to suggest that the MBHO shifted treatment costs.


Related Article:

January 2007: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2007 58: 7. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. G. Kathol and Y. Kishi
Calculating Treatment Costs in an MBHO
Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2007; 58(3): 413 - 413.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org