Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 57:713-715, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.5.713
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Lexcen, F. J.
* Articles by Blank, M. B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Lexcen, F. J.
* Articles by Blank, M. B.
Related Collections
* Rural and Underserved Patients
* Access to Services
* Computers, Telecommunications

Brief Report

Use of Video Conferencing for Psychiatric and Forensic Evaluations

Frances J. Lexcen, Ph.D., Gary L. Hawk, Ph.D., Steve Herrick, Ph.D. and Michael B. Blank, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether the quality of results from video interviews is comparable with that of in-person interviews. METHODS: Interrater reliabilities for two video conference interview conditions were compared with those for in-person interviews with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Anchored Version and the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication, given to 72 forensic inpatients. The video conditions included in-person and remote interviewers. In the first condition, an in-person interviewer administered the instruments, with remote observation and scoring. The second condition entailed remote administration and an in-person observer. The third condition used an in-person interviewer and observer. RESULTS: Good to excellent reliabilities resulted from all conditions with intraclass correlations of .69 to .82. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that providers can expect remote interviews to provide clinical information similar to that obtained by in-person interviews.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. M. Wettstein
Commentary: Forensic Evaluation of Military Personnel
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2009; 37(3): 329 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
G. M. Manguno-Mire, J. W. Thompson Jr, J. H. Shore, C. D. Croy, J. F. Artecona, and J. W. Pickering
The Use of Telemedicine to Evaluate Competency to Stand Trial: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 481 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org