
Psychiatr Serv 57:713-715, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.5.713
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Use of Video Conferencing for Psychiatric and Forensic Evaluations
Frances J. Lexcen, Ph.D.,
Gary L. Hawk, Ph.D.,
Steve Herrick, Ph.D. and
Michael B. Blank, Ph.D.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether the quality of results from video interviews is comparable with that of in-person interviews. METHODS: Interrater reliabilities for two video conference interview conditions were compared with those for in-person interviews with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Anchored Version and the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication, given to 72 forensic inpatients. The video conditions included in-person and remote interviewers. In the first condition, an in-person interviewer administered the instruments, with remote observation and scoring. The second condition entailed remote administration and an in-person observer. The third condition used an in-person interviewer and observer. RESULTS: Good to excellent reliabilities resulted from all conditions with intraclass correlations of .69 to .82. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that providers can expect remote interviews to provide clinical information similar to that obtained by in-person interviews.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Manguno-Mire, J. W. Thompson Jr, J. H. Shore, C. D. Croy, J. F. Artecona, and J. W. Pickering
The Use of Telemedicine to Evaluate Competency to Stand Trial: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,
December 1, 2007;
35(4):
481 - 489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|