Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 57:544-549, April 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.544
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Munetz, M. R.
* Articles by Griffin, P. A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Munetz, M. R.
* Articles by Griffin, P. A.
Related Collections
* Chronically Mentally Ill Patients
* Mentally Ill Offenders
* Crisis and Emergency Treatment

Article

Use of the Sequential Intercept Model as an Approach to Decriminalization of People With Serious Mental Illness

Mark R. Munetz, M.D. and Patricia A. Griffin, Ph.D.

The Sequential Intercept Model provides a conceptual framework for communities to use when considering the interface between the criminal justice and mental health systems as they address concerns about criminalization of people with mental illness. The model envisions a series of points of interception at which an intervention can be made to prevent individuals from entering or penetrating deeper into the criminal justice system. Ideally, most people will be intercepted at early points, with decreasing numbers at each subsequent point. The interception points are law enforcement and emergency services; initial detention and initial hearings; jail, courts, forensic evaluations, and forensic commitments; reentry from jails, state prisons, and forensic hospitalization; and community corrections and community support. The model provides an organizing tool for a discussion of diversion and linkage alternatives and for systematically addressing criminalization. Using the model, a community can develop targeted strategies that evolve over time to increase diversion of people with mental illness from the criminal justice system and to link them with community treatment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. Metraux
Examining Relationships Between Receiving Mental Health Services in the Pennsylvania Prison System and Time Served
Psychiatr Serv, July 1, 2008; 59(7): 800 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
M. T. Compton, M. Bahora, A. C. Watson, and J. R. Oliva
A Comprehensive Review of Extant Research on Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Programs
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. D. Bloom
Civil Commitment Is Disappearing in Oregon
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 534 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org