Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Elbogen, E. B. Articles by Scheyett, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Elbogen, E. B. Articles by Scheyett, A. Other Ethics Issues Service Utilization Other Health Services Issues Related Article

Clinical Decision Making and Views About Psychiatric Advance Directives

OBJECTIVES: Psychiatric advance directives allow competent persons to document advance instructions or designate a health care agent to communicate their preferences for future mental health treatment in the event of an incapacitating crisis. Although laws authorizing psychiatric advance directives have proliferated, little is known about clinicians' understanding and perceptions of these legal tools. METHODS: A total of 597 mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) completed a survey about their attitudes toward psychiatric advance directives and decision making about following such directives. RESULTS: Approximately half the sample (47 percent) agreed that advance instructions would be helpful to consumers with severe mental illnesses, and a majority (57 percent) endorsed health care agents as beneficial. Regardless of profession, clinicians had more positive attitudes about psychiatric advance directives when they correctly recognized that they were not required by state law to follow directives that note the patient' s refusal of appropriate medical treatment. In multivariate analyses, the decision to abide by a patient' s advance refusal of treatment in a hypothetical scenario was predicted by knowing the laws associated with these directives, valuing family opinions about treatment, and respecting patient autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians correctly apprised of the state law were more likely to endorse psychiatric advance directives. Thus clinicians may be more willing to use directives if they are educated about the legal parameters of their implementation. The clinicians' profession had only an indirect influence on whether clinicians would follow an advance instruction that noted the patient's refusal of appropriate treatment; rather, clinicians' values and legal knowledge had the greatest effect, highlighting the potentially complex ethical dilemmas faced by mental health professionals who encounter these directives.

Related Article:

March 2006: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 299. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Van Dorn, J. W. Swanson, and M. S. Swartz Preferences for Psychiatric Advance Directives Among Latinos: Views on Advance Care Planning for Mental Health Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2009; 60(10): 1383 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Henderson, J. W. Swanson, G. Szmukler, G. Thornicroft, and M. Zinkler A Typology of Advance Statements in Mental Health Care Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2008; 59(1): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Van Citters, U. Naidoo, and M. E. Foti Using a Hypothetical Scenario to Inform Psychiatric Advance Directives Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2007; 58(11): 1467 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us