
Psychiatr Serv 57:1421-1429, October 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1421
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Strategies for Coping With Cognitive Impairments of Clients in Supported Employment
Susan R. McGurk, Ph.D. and
Kim T. Mueser, Ph.D.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the strategies used by employment specialists to help clients in supported employment programs manage cognitive impairments that interfered with obtaining and keeping jobs. METHODS: Twenty-five supported employment specialists were surveyed to identify strategies they used to help their clients cope with cognitive problems in the domains of attention, psychomotor speed, memory, and problem solving. Then, 50 employment specialists were surveyed to determine whether they used each of the different coping strategies generated in the first part of the study. For each strategy used, they rated how effective it was. RESULTS: Employment specialists reported using a total of 76 different strategies for helping their clients cope with cognitive difficulties. The specialists reported using an average of 48 different coping strategies, which they rated on average as just below effective. Strategies for dealing with attention problems were rated as more effective than strategies used in the other three domains. The number of coping strategies that they reported using was significantly correlated with the perceived effectiveness of the strategies and the proportion of clients in their caseload who were working. CONCLUSIONS: Supported employment specialists were actively involved in helping clients cope with their cognitive impairments. Use of more strategies was correlated with specialists' greater perceived effectiveness of the strategies and with higher rates of working clients on their caseloads, although the reasons for these associations are unclear. Further research is needed to evaluate whether employment specialists' use of more strategies to help clients cope with cognitive problems contributes to better work outcomes.
Related Article:
-
October 2006: This Month's Highlight
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 1369.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Pitschel-Walz, J. Bauml, T. Frobose, A. Gsottschneider, and T. Jahn
Do individuals with schizophrenia and a borderline intellectual disability benefit from psychoeducational groups?
J Intellect Disabil.,
December 1, 2009;
13(4):
305 - 320.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Silverstein, W. D. Spaulding, A. A. Menditto, A. Savitz, R. P. Liberman, S. Berten, and H. Starobin
Attention Shaping: a Reward-Based Learning Method to Enhance Skills Training Outcomes in Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull,
January 1, 2009;
35(1):
222 - 232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. McGurk, K. T. Mueser, K. Feldman,, R. Wolfe,, and A. Pascaris,
Cognitive Training for Supported Employment: 2-3 Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Am J Psychiatry,
March 1, 2007;
164(3):
437 - 441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|