Full Text Full Text (PDF) Figure Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Meredith, L. S. Articles by Unützer, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Meredith, L. S. Articles by Unützer, J. Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines Depression Related Article

Implementation and Maintenance of Quality Improvement for Treating Depression in Primary Care

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the long-term success of quality improvement efforts for the treatment of depression in primary care. This study assessed factors associated with the successful implementation, maintenance, and spread of such efforts. METHODS: The authors conducted an independent process evaluation of data from monthly progress reports and 18-month telephone interviews from multidisciplinary quality improvement teams in 17 diverse primary care organizations that participated in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series for Depression from February 2000 through March 2001. RESULTS: All sites made changes toward improving care in three of six categories: delivery system redesign, self-management strategies, and information systems. The changes that were most commonly viewed as major successes were delivery system changes (ten sites, or 59 percent) and information system changes (nine sites, or 53 percent); these types of changes were also the most often sustained over time (ten sites, or 59 percent, and 16 sites, or 94 percent, respectively). Fifteen sites made changes in decision support, community linkages, and health system support but were less likely to view these changes as major successes or to sustain them. Organizational structure and leadership support were the most common facilitators. Staff resistance, time constraints, and information technology were the most common barriers. Implementation strategies varied with sets of barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial challenges, there was evidence of broad success at implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for depression treatment in primary care.

Related Article:

January 2006: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 11. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Katon and J. Unutzer Collaborative Care Models for Depression: Time to Move From Evidence to Practice Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2006; 166(21): 2304 - 2306. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Druss, T. Bornemann, Y. W. Fry-Johnson, H. G. McCombs, R. M. Politzer, and G. Rust Trends in Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services at the Nation's Community Health Centers: 1998-2003 Am J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 96(10): 1779 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us