Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Mulder, C. L. Articles by Lyons, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Mulder, C. L. Articles by Lyons, J. S. Patient Admission, Discharge Commitment of the Mentally Ill Crisis and Emergency Treatment Hospitals, Hospital Treatment Outcome and Process Assessment Related Article

Special Section on the GAF: Determinants of Indicated Versus Actual Level of Care in Psychiatric Emergency Services

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to improve understanding of the admission decision process by distinguishing between the clinically indicated level of care and actual level-of-care decisions in emergency psychiatry. METHODS: Clinicians in emergency psychiatric services in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, prospectively rated 720 patients by using the Severity of Psychiatric Illness Scale and collected information on demographic, clinical, and contextual parameters. The clinically indicated level of care and actual level-of-care decisions were studied independently, by using multivariate logistic regression analyses. The decision-making process was divided into three consecutive steps: evaluation of clinically indicated inpatient or outpatient level of care (step 1), voluntary or involuntary admission (step 2), and actual admission of patients for whom voluntary admission was indicated (step 3). RESULTS: Each step was determined by separate factors. Specifically, clinically indicated admission (step 1) was associated with family or friends' desire for admission (odds ratio [OR]=3.7), previous admissions (OR=2.9), symptom severity (OR=2.7), and personality disorder (OR=.4). Involuntary admission (step 2) was associated with lack of motivation (OR=5.7), symptom severity (OR=3.7), time of referral (OR=3.5) and danger to self or others (OR=2.7). Actual voluntary admission (step 3) was associated mainly with bed availability (OR=8.7). The overall percentage of correctly predicted cases was 82 percent for all steps in the decision process. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that each step in the admission decision process is determined by a unique set of variables and provided evidence that contextual factors influence decision making. Guidelines for voluntary admission and civil commitment need to be based on the results of studies that distinguish between the clinical needs of patients and contextual factors.

Related Article:

April 2005: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2005 56: 395. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. L. MULDER, G. T. KOOPMANS, and J.-P. SELTEN Emergency psychiatry, compulsory admissions and clinical presentation among immigrants to The Netherlands The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 188(4): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us