Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 56:1570-1582, December 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.12.1570
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Addington, D.
* Articles by Adair, C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Addington, D.
* Articles by Adair, C.
Related Collections
* Outcome and Process Assessment
* Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines
* Other Health Services Issues
* Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
*Related Article

Article

Performance Measures for Early Psychosis Treatment Services

Donald Addington, M.B.B.S., Emily McKenzie, M.Sc., Jean Addington, Ph.D., Scott Patten, M.D., Ph.D., Harvey Smith, Ph.D. and Carol Adair, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the feasibility of identifying performance measures for early psychosis treatment services and obtaining consensus for these measures. The requirements of the study were that the processes used to identify measures and gain consensus should be comprehensive, be reproducible, and reflect the perspective of multiple stakeholders in Canada. METHODS: The study was conducted in two stages. First a literature review was performed to gather articles published from 1995 to July 2002, and experts were consulted to determine performance measures. Second, a consensus-building technique, the Delphi process, was used with nominated participants from seven groups of stakeholders. Twenty stakeholders participated in three rounds of questionnaires. The degree of consensus achieved by the Delphi process was assessed by calculating the semi-interquartile range for each measure. RESULTS: Seventy-three performance measures were identified from the literature review and consultation with experts. The Delphi method reduced the list to 24 measures rated as essential. This approach proved to be both feasible and cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the diversity in the backgrounds of the stakeholder groups, the Delphi technique was effective in moving participants' ratings toward consensus through successive questionnaire rounds. The resulting measures reflected the interests of all stakeholders.


Related Article:

December 2005: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2005 56: 1490. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
A. Burnam
Commentary: Selecting Performance Measures by Consensus: An Appropriate Extension of the Delphi Method?
Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2005; 56(12): 1583 - 1583.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org