Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Foster, E. M.
* Articles by Connor, T.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Foster, E. M.
* Articles by Connor, T.
Related Collections
* Child/Adolescent Psychiatry
* Costs, Cost Analysis
* Financing of Programs
* Other Health Services Issues
Psychiatr Serv 56:50-55, January 2005
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association

Public Costs of Better Mental Health Services for Children and Adolescents

E. Michael Foster, Ph.D. and Tim Connor, M.S.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated how improved community mental health services for youths affect public expenditures in other sectors, including inpatient hospitalization, the juvenile justice system, the child welfare system, and the special education system. METHODS: Participants were youths aged six to 17 years who received services through a mental health agency in one of a matched pair of communities. One community delivered mental health services according to the principles of systems of care (N=220). The comparison community delivered mental health services but did not provide for the interagency integration of services (N=211). The analyses are based on administrative and interview data. RESULTS: Preliminary analyses revealed that mental health services delivered as part of a system-of-care approach are more expensive. However, incorporating expenditures in other sectors reduced the between-site gap in expenditures from 81 to 18 percent. This estimate is robust to changes in analytical methods as well as adjustments for differences between the two sites in the baseline characteristics of participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that reduced expenditures in other sectors that serve youths substantially, but only partially, offset the costs of improved mental health services. The full fiscal impact of improved mental health services can be assessed only in the context of their impact on other sectors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. H. Stephan, M. Weist, S. Kataoka, S. Adelsheim, and C. Mills
Transformation of Children's Mental Health Services: The Role of School Mental Health
Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2007; 58(10): 1330 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
E. J. Costello, W. Copeland, A. Cowell, and G. Keeler
Service Costs of Caring for Adolescents With Mental Illness in a Rural Community, 1993-2000
Am J Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 164(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org