Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Hodges, K.
* Articles by Wotring, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Hodges, K.
* Articles by Wotring, J.
Related Collections
* Outcome and Process Assessment
Psychiatr Serv 55:396-400, April 2004
© 2004 American Psychiatric Association

The Role of Monitoring Outcomes in Initiating Implementation of Evidence-Based Treatments at the State Level

Kay Hodges, Ph.D. and Jim Wotring, M.S.W.

This article describes a six-year statewide initiative to help mental health service providers in continuously monitoring the outcomes of youths with serious emotional disturbances who are treated in the public-sector managed behavioral health care system. Participating providers submit outcome data to a state-sponsored evaluator, using the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS), and receive monthly feedback that identifies youths who are making poor progress in treatment. Additional reports are used to ensure record compliance, monitor at-risk youths, and assist in reviewing the adequacy of treatment plans. In addition, outcome data for closed cases are generated for various types of clients. The consistently poor outcomes for some types of clients have generated a genuine interest among clinical staff in learning and implementing evidence-based treatments. The data for all participating providers were pooled to generate state averages for various indicators so that each provider can compare their site to these benchmarks. State administrators consider the data in generating policy and identifying systemwide needs. The processes that shaped this initiative and that created the providers' investment in continuous quality improvement activities are described.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
D. L. Fixsen, K. A. Blase, S. F. Naoom, and F. Wallace
Core Implementation Components
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2009; 19(5): 531 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. SLADE, P. McCRONE, E. KUIPERS, M. LEESE, S. CAHILL, A. PARABIAGHI, S. PRIEBE, and G. THORNICROFT
Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: Randomised controlled trial
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 189(4): 330 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2004 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org