Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Schoenbaum, M. Articles by Pincus, H. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Schoenbaum, M. Articles by Pincus, H. Health Insurance Depression Other Health Services Issues

Exploratory Evidence on the Market for Effective Depression Care in Pittsburgh

OBJECTIVE: Despite the existence of effective and relatively cost-effective depression treatments, many depressed patients do not receive appropriate care. The authors assessed opportunities for increasing the rate of effective depression treatment by investigating the market for such treatment in the Pittsburgh area. METHODS: A conceptual framework was developed to evaluate the market for effective depression care. On the basis of the conceptual framework, interviews were conducted with representatives from seven large employers, two medical health insurance carriers, two behavioral health insurance carriers, four primary care providers, and four behavioral health care providers. Respondents were asked to assess the barriers to and opportunities for increasing the rates of depression treatment from their perspectives. RESULTS: The findings suggest that there is currently little demand among purchasers for improving depression care and little interest among insurers and providers for improving care in the absence of purchaser demand. Even stakeholders who identified depression as an important problem could not come to a consensus about who should be responsible for addressing the problem. Employers reported that they look primarily to their vendors to initiate quality improvement efforts, whereas insurers reported that such improvement efforts were more likely to occur if they were initiated by employers who purchase their health plans; providers, in turn, reported feeling powerless to initiate change. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a clear locus of responsibility for improving depression care lends considerable inertia to the status quo. Because the currently low treatment rates are likely to be socially inefficient, researchers and policy makers should consider strategies to help overcome this inertia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. S. Wang, G. E. Simon, J. Avorn, F. Azocar, E. J. Ludman, J. McCulloch, M. Z. Petukhova, and R. C. Kessler Telephone Screening, Outreach, and Care Management for Depressed Workers and Impact on Clinical and Work Productivity Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, September 26, 2007; 298(12): 1401 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Wang, A. Patrick, J. Avorn, F. Azocar, E. Ludman, J. McCulloch, G. Simon, and R. Kessler The Costs and Benefits of Enhanced Depression Care to Employers Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 63(12): 1345 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Croghan, M. Schoenbaum, C. D. Sherbourne, and P. Koegel A Framework to Improve the Quality of Treatment for Depression in Primary Care Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2006; 57(5): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Unutzer, M. Schoenbaum, B. G. Druss, and W. J. Katon Transforming Mental Health Care at the Interface With General Medicine: Report for the Presidents Commission Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2006; 57(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Pincus, J. K. Houtsinger, J. Bachman, and D. Keyser Depression In Primary Care: Bringing Behavioral Health Care Into The Mainstream Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 271 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2004 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us