Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Arfken, C. L. Articles by Amirsadri, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Arfken, C. L. Articles by Amirsadri, A. Access to Services Crisis and Emergency Treatment Service Utilization

Case-Control Study of Frequent Visitors to an Urban Psychiatric Emergency Service

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for people who use psychiatric emergency services repeatedly and to estimate their financial charges. METHODS: The authors used interviews and chart reviews to compare 74 patients who had six or more visits to an urban psychiatric emergency service in the 12 months before an index visit with 74 patients who had five or fewer visits. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Independent risk factors for frequent visitors were self-reported hospitalization in the past 12 months, need for medications as the self-reported reason for seeking care, being homeless or living in an institution, and not giving the name of a friend or family member for interview. The level of burden for support of persons who were interviewed was low and did not differ between frequent and infrequent visitors. Compared with infrequent visitors, frequent visitors had greater utilization of inpatient and outpatient behavioral health services, general emergency services, and crisis residential services in the 12 months before the index visit and greater utilization of general emergency services and psychiatric emergency services in the three months after the index visit. Frequent visitors' median financial charge for those services was $16,200 greater (5.9 times greater) than that of infrequent visitors. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent visitors represent resource-poor mentally ill persons who have high levels of utilization of health care facilities besides psychiatric emergency services. Possible clinical interventions for these patients include focused medication reviews.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Marini, M. Semenzin, F. Vignaga, M. Gardiolo, A. Drago, F. Caon, M. Benetazzo, C. Pavan, A. Piotto, L. Federico, et al. Dropout in Institutional Emotional Crisis Counseling and Brief Focused Intervention Brief. Treat. Crisis Interven., November 1, 2005; 5(4): 356 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pasic, J. Russo, and P. Roy-Byrne High Utilizers of Psychiatric Emergency Services Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2005; 56(6): 678 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2004 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us