Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Jones, K. Articles by Wyatt, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, K. Articles by Wyatt, R. J. Homeless Persons Costs, Cost Analysis

Cost-Effectiveness of Critical Time Intervention to Reduce Homelessness Among Persons With Mental Illness

OBJECTIVES: Cost-effective programs are needed to assist homeless persons with severe mental illness in their transition from shelters to community living. The authors investigated the cost-effectiveness of the critical time intervention program, a time-limited adaptation of intensive case management, which has been shown to significantly reduce recurrent homelessness among men with severe mental illness. METHODS: Ninety-six study participants recruited from a psychiatric program in a men's public shelter from 1991 to 1993 were randomly assigned to the critical time intervention program or to usual services. Costs and housing outcomes for the two groups were examined over 18 months. RESULTS: Over the study period, the critical time intervention group and the usual services group incurred mean costs of $52,374 and $51,649, respectively, for acute care services, outpatient services, housing and shelter services, criminal justice services, and transfer income. During the same period, the critical time intervention group experienced significantly fewer homeless nights than the usual care group (32 nights versus 90 nights). For each willingness-to-pay value—the additional price society is willing to spend for an additional nonhomeless night—greater than $152, the critical time intervention group exhibited a significantly greater net housing stability benefit, indicating cost-effectiveness, compared with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Although difficult to conduct, studies of the cost-effectiveness of community mental health programs can yield rich information for policy makers and program planners. The critical time intervention program is not only an effective method to reduce recurrent homelessness among persons with severe mental illness but also represents a cost-effective alternative to the status quo.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Dixon, R. Goldberg, V. Iannone, A. Lucksted, C. Brown, J. Kreyenbuhl, L. Fang, and W. Potts Use of a Critical Time Intervention to Promote Continuity of Care After Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitalization Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2009; 60(4): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Draine and D. B. Herman Critical Time Intervention for Reentry From Prison for Persons With Mental Illness Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2007; 58(12): 1577 - 1581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Roberts, J. Cumming, and K. Nelson A Review of Economic Evaluations of Community Mental Health Care Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2005; 62(5): 503 - 543. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Folsom, W. Hawthorne, L. Lindamer, T. Gilmer, A. Bailey, S. Golshan, P. Garcia, J. Unutzer, R. Hough, and D. V. Jeste Prevalence and Risk Factors for Homelessness and Utilization of Mental Health Services Among 10,340 Patients With Serious Mental Illness in a Large Public Mental Health System Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 162(2): 370 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2003 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us