Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Corrigan, P. W.
* Articles by Watson, A. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Corrigan, P. W.
* Articles by Watson, A. C.
Related Collections
* Patient Advocacy
* Stigma, Discrimination
* Health Policy and Legislation
* Needs Assessment
Psychiatr Serv 54:501-507, April 2003
© 2003 American Psychiatric Association


Other Articles

Factors That Explain How Policy Makers Distribute Resources to Mental Health Services

Patrick W. Corrigan, Ph.D. and Amy C. Watson, Ph.D.

Advocates hope to influence the resource allocation decisions of legislators and other policy makers to capture more resources for mental health programs. Findings from social psychological research suggest factors that, if pursued, may improve advocacy efforts. In particular, allocation decisions are affected by policy makers' perceptions of the scarcity of resources, effectiveness of specific programs, needs of people who have problems that are served by these programs, and extent of personal responsibility for these problems. These perceptions are further influenced by political ideology. Conservatives are motivated by a tendency to punish persons who are perceived as having personal responsibility for their problems by withholding resources, whereas liberals are likely to avoid tough allocation decisions. Moreover, these perceptions are affected by political accountability, that is, whether politicians perceive that their constituents will closely monitor their decisions. Just as the quality of clinical interventions improves when informed by basic research on human behavior, the efforts of mental health advocates will be advanced when they understand the psychological forces that affect policy makers' decisions about resources.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
C. C. Collins and W. W. Dressler
Cultural Consensus and Cultural Diversity: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Human Service Providers' Models of Domestic Violence
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2008; 2(4): 362 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. Block, M. Slomp, S. Patterson, P. Jacobs, A. E. Ohinmaa, R. Yim, and C. S. Dewa
The Impact of Integrating Mental and General Health Services on Mental Health's Share of Total Health Care Spending in Alberta
Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2008; 59(8): 860 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2003 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org