Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Dixon, L. Articles by Becker, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Dixon, L. Articles by Becker, D. Chronically Mentally Ill Patients Costs, Cost Analysis Housing and Vocational Support

Cost-Effectiveness of Two Vocational Rehabilitation Programs for Persons With Severe Mental Illness

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine differences in the cost-effectiveness of two vocational programs: individual placement and support (IPS), in which employment specialists within a mental health center help patients obtain competitive jobs and provide them with ongoing support, and enhanced vocational rehabilitation (EVR), in which stepwise services that involve prevocational experiences are delivered by rehabilitation agencies. METHODS: A total of 150 unemployed inner-city patients with severe mental disorders who expressed an interest in competitive employment were randomly assigned to IPS or EVR programs and were followed for 18 months. Wages from all forms of employment and the number of weeks and hours of competitive employment were tracked monthly. Estimates were made of direct mental health costs and vocational costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for competitive employment outcomes and total wages. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the overall costs of IPS and EVR. Participation in the IPS program was associated with significantly more hours and weeks of competitive employment. However, the average combined earnings—earnings from competitive and noncompetitive employment—were virtually the same both programs. The ICER estimates indicated that participants in the IPS program worked in competitive employment settings for an additional week over the 18-month period at a cost of $283 ($13 an hour). CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest that IPS participants engaged in competitive employment at a higher cost. When combined earnings were used as the outcome, data from the statistical analyses were insufficient to enable any firm conclusions to be drawn. The findings illustrate the importance of choice of outcomes in evaluations of employment programs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. E. Biegel, S. Swanson, and L. A. Kola The Ohio Supported Employment Coordinating Center of Excellence Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2007; 17(4): 504 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Macias, C. F. Rodican, W. A. Hargreaves, D. R. Jones, P. J. Barreira, and Q. Wang Supported Employment Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of ACT and Clubhouse Models Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2006; 57(10): 1406 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us