Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Morrissey, J. P. Articles by the ACCESS National Evaluation Team, Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Morrissey, J. P. Articles by the ACCESS National Evaluation Team, Chronically Mentally Ill Patients Homeless Persons Other Health Services Issues

Integration of Service Systems for Homeless Persons With Serious Mental Illness Through the ACCESS Program

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the first of the two core questions around which the ACCESS (Access to Community Care and Effective Services and Supports) evaluation was designed: Does implementation of system-change strategies lead to better integration of service systems? METHODS: The study was part of the five-year federal ACCESS service demonstration program, which sought to enhance integration of service delivery systems for homeless persons with serious mental illness. Data were gathered from nine randomly selected experimental sites and nine comparison sites in 15 of the nation's largest cities on the degree to which each site implemented a set of systems integration strategies and the degree of systems integration that ensued among community agencies across five service sectors: mental health, substance abuse, primary care, housing, and social welfare and entitlement services. Integration was measured across all interorganizational relationships in the local service networks (overall systems integration) and across relationships involving only the primary ACCESS grantee organization (project-centered integration). RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, the nine experimental sites did not demonstrate significantly greater overall systems integration than the nine comparison sites. However, the experimental sites demonstrated better project-centered integration than the comparison sites. Moreover, more extensive implementation of strategies for system change was associated with higher levels of overall systems integration as well as project-centered integration at both the experimental sites and the comparison sites. CONCLUSIONS: The ACCESS demonstration was successful in terms of project-centered integration but not overall system integration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Lemieux-Charles, L. W. Chambers, R. Cockerill, S. Jaglal, K. Brazil, C. Cohen, K. LeClair, B. Dalziel, and B. Schulman Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community-Based Dementia Care Networks: The Dementia Care Networks' Study Gerontologist, August 1, 2005; 45(4): 456 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. McGuire and R. A. Rosenheck Criminal History as a Prognostic Indicator in the Treatment of Homeless People With Severe Mental Illness Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2004; 55(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Rosenheck, J. Lam, J. P. Morrissey, M. O. Calloway, M. Stolar, F. Randolph, and the ACCESS National Evaluation Team Service Systems Integration and Outcomes for Mentally Ill Homeless Persons in the ACCESS Program Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2002; 53(8): 958 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. H. Goldman, J. P. Morrissey, R. A. Rosenheck, J. Cocozza, M. Blasinsky, F. Randolph, and the ACCESS National Evaluation Team Lessons From the Evaluation of the ACCESS Program Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2002; 53(8): 967 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us