Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Ullman, M. D. Articles by Burris, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Ullman, M. D. Articles by Burris, S. Stigma, Discrimination

The EEOC Charge Priority Policy and Claimants With Psychiatric Disabilities

OBJECTIVE: In June 1995 the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) instituted a new charge priority policy. Under the new policy, charges are classified as one of three priority levels during or immediately after intake. Only charges assigned a high priority receive a full investigation. This paper examines the effect of the charge priority policy on individuals with psychiatric disabilities who filed Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) charges with the EEOC. METHODS: Using data extracted from the EEOC's charge data system, the authors analyzed all 66,298 ADA claims prioritized and closed between June 1995 and March 1998. The z test for difference in proportions and the generalized estimating equations procedure were used. The primary outcome measure was the priority assignment received by ADA claimants. RESULTS: Charges that received a high priority assignment were more likely to result in benefits for claimants. Charges filed by claimants with psychiatric disabilities were significantly less likely to be assigned a high priority than charges filed by other claimants. Claimants with psychiatric disabilities were also significantly less likely to benefit from their claims. CONCLUSIONS: The strong relationship between being assigned high priority and receiving benefits as a result of filing a charge demonstrates the importance of accurate priority categorization. The finding that people with psychiatric disabilities are less likely than others to benefit from their claims is cause for concern, particularly given the fact that the accuracy of the charge prioritization system has not been validated.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Cook Employment Barriers for Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities: Update of a Report for the President's Commission Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2006; 57(10): 1391 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Glozier Mental ill health and fitness for work Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2002; 59(10): 714 - 720. [Full Text]

				K. Moss, J. Swanson, M. Ullman, and S. Burris Mediation of Employment Discrimination Disputes Involving Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2002; 53(8): 988 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2001 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us