
Psychiatr Serv 52:631-636, May 2001
© 2001 American Psychiatric Association
Case Management and Assertive Community Treatment in Europe
Tom Burns, M.D., F.R.C.Psych.,
Angelo Fioritti, M.D.,
Frank Holloway, F.R.C.Psych.,
Ulf Malm, M.D. and
Wulf Rössler, M.D.
OBJECTIVE: Case management studies from Europe and the United States continue to yield conflicting results. At a symposium at the World Psychiatric Conference in Hamburg in 1999, researchers from four European countries explored the possible reasons for differences in outcome. They also examined reasons for the differing foci of case management studies across the different cultures. The authors summarize the symposium's findings. METHODS: Individual case presentations were given of studies and services from the United Kingdom (three studies), Sweden (two studies), Germany, and Italy (one each). Outcomes, methodologies, and national service context were examined. Results and conclusions: A significant influence of national culture is evident both in the acceptability of case management and in approaches to researching it. Case management is perceived as an "Anglophone import" in Italy but is now national policy for persons with severe mental illness in the other three countries. Studies from the United Kingdom emphasized methodological rigor, with little attention to treatment content, whereas those from Sweden accepted a less disruptive research approach but with a more prescriptive stipulation of treatment content. Studies from Italy and Germany emphasized the importance of differing descriptive methodologies. Marked differences in the range of social care provision were noted across Europe. Overall, European researchers are less concerned than U.S. researchers with studying the impact of case management on hospital use.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Burns, J. Catty, M. Dash, C. Roberts, A. Lockwood, and M. Marshall
Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression
BMJ,
August 18, 2007;
335(7615):
336 - 336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Roeg, I. van de Goor, and H. Garretsen
Towards quality indicators for assertive outreach programmes for severely impaired substance abusers: concept mapping with Dutch experts
Int. J. Qual. Health Care,
June 1, 2005;
17(3):
203 - 208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Thornicroft and M. Tansella
Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care: Overview of systematic evidence
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
October 1, 2004;
185(4):
283 - 290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Vanderplasschen, R. C. Rapp, J. R. Wolf, and E. Broekaert
The Development and Implementation of Case Management for Substance Use Disorders in North America and Europe
Psychiatr Serv,
August 1, 2004;
55(8):
913 - 922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Stovall
Assertive Outreach in Mental Health: A Manual for Practitioners
Psychiatr Serv,
November 1, 2003;
54(11):
1549 - 1549.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Pyszora and J. Telfer
Implementation of the Care Programme Approach in prison
Psychiatr. Bull.,
May 1, 2003;
27(5):
173 - 176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. HOLLOWAY
Outcome measurement in mental health -- welcome to the revolution
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
July 1, 2002;
181(1):
1 - 2.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2001
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|