Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Devitt, P. J. Articles by Dewan, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Devitt, P. J. Articles by Dewan, M. Treatment Compliance Other Ethics Issues Hospitals, Hospital Treatment Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines

An Examination of Whether Discharging Patients Against Medical Advice Protects Physicians From Malpractice Charges

OBJECTIVE: Many physicians believe that documenting a discharge as "against medical advice" protects them from legal actions for adverse consequences related to the discharge. The authors examined case law for evidence of such protection. METHODS: MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched for relevant articles. The medmal.base of Lexis and West Group was searched for annotated case law. RESULTS: Four relevant cases were found in which medical authorities and physicians were sued for medical malpractice even though they discharged a patient against medical advice. In all cases the defendants prevailed. However, their success was not due to the fact that they used the procedure of discharging patients against medical advice. Rather, it was based on the plaintiffs' failure to prove negligence. The authors offer guidelines for physicians faced with the decision to discharge against medical advice. Physicians should perform a careful and well-documented examination. They should assess the severity of illness and the severity of the risk if the patient is discharged. They should engage in a constructive dialogue with the patient about grievances. They should ensure that the patient's withholding of consent for further hospitalization is informed with respect to risks, benefits, and alternatives. If the patient meets criteria for involuntary hospitalization, the patient should be committed. CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical practice and thorough documentation remain the best legal protection. Discharging a patient against medical advice may provide partial protection, but it is not a royal road to legal immunity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Reinke, M. Walker, S. Boslaugh, and D. Hodge III Predictors of Pediatric Emergency Patients Discharged Against Medical Advice Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2009; 48(3): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Alfandre "I'm Going Home": Discharges Against Medical Advice Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2009; 84(3): 255 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us