Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Adler, D. A. Articles by Kosinski, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Adler, D. A. Articles by Kosinski, M. Rating Scales (Nondiagnostic)

Patient-Based Health Status Assessments in an Outpatient Psychiatry Setting

OBJECTIVE: The reliability, validity, and feasibility of the routine use of a generic health status instrument, the Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), were examined in a psychiatric outpatient clinic of a general hospital. METHODS: The sample comprised 411 patients referred to an outpatient psychiatry department between April 1994 and March 1995. They filled out the SF-36 along with their admission forms. Scores and reports were generated, and the results were returned to the charts and used at weekly clinical conference discussions. Feasibility was evaluated using subjective and objective data on administration of the instrument, its psychometric properties, and costs. Results from the outpatient psychiatry patients were compared with those from patients scheduled for elective surgery and a healthy normative sample. RESULTS: Routine administration of the SF-36 was successfully achieved with minimal resistance from staff and patients. The SF-36 provided reliable and valid data. As predicted, patients with emotional disorders scored lower, indicating more impairment, on scales measuring mental health than did the elective surgery patients and the normative sample. However, the psychiatric patients' scores on the physical health scale were lower than clinicians expected. Compared with the elective surgery patients, the psychiatric patients were less impaired on only the physical functioning and bodily pain scales; no difference was found between the two groups in role functioning due to physical problems. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of the SF-36 in a general hospital psychiatric outpatient clinic was feasible, and the results were reliable, valid, and helpful to clinicians. Psychiatric patients' significantly lower scores in physical health and social and role functioning provided additional information about their difficulties.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L Whitney, R. G Jacob, P. J Sparto, E. F Olshansky, G. Detweiler-Shostak, E. L Brown, and J. M Furman Acrophobia and Pathological Height Vertigo: Indications for Vestibular Physical Therapy? Physical Therapy, May 1, 2005; 85(5): 443 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Sanderson and G. Andrews Prevalence and Severity of Mental Health-Related Disability and Relationship to Diagnosis Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 80 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us