Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Engleman, N. B. Articles by Langbein, L. I. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Engleman, N. B. Articles by Langbein, L. I. Commitment of the Mentally Ill

Clinicians' Decision Making About Involuntary Commitment

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians' decision making about involuntary commitment was examined, with a focus on the effects of patient and clinician characteristics and bed availability on decisions to detain patients, the first step in involuntary commitment. METHODS: Eighteen psychologists and social workers in the emergency service of a community mental health center completed the Risk Assessment Questionnaire for 169 consecutive patients they deemed to present some degree of risk. Forty-two patients were detained. RESULTS: Three underlying constructs were significantly associated with a patient's overall risk rating, which in turn predicted the decision to detain. Two were clinician characteristics: the clinician detention ratio, which reflects the proportion of patients detained by the clinician in the past three months, and the setting in which the evaluation occurred, either an in-house emergency service or a mobile crisis unit. The availability of detention beds in the community was also a significant predictor of whether a patient would be detained. No patient characteristic, including diagnosis, sex, age, or insurance status, was significantly related to the detention decision. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the decision-making process is influenced by multiple factors, such as setting, the clinician's tendency to detain patients, and the availability of detention beds.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Brooks Psychiatrists' Opinions About Involuntary Civil Commitment: Results of a National Survey J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2007; 35(2): 219 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sattar, D. A. Pinals, A. U. Din, and P. S. Appelbaum To Commit or Not to Commit: The Psychiatry Resident as a Variable in Involuntary Commitment Decisions Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 191 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Mulder, G. T. Koopmans, and J. S. Lyons Special Section on the GAF: Determinants of Indicated Versus Actual Level of Care in Psychiatric Emergency Services Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2005; 56(4): 452 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Binder and D. E. McNiel Emergency Psychiatry: Contemporary Practices in Managing Acutely Violent Patients in 20 Psychiatric Emergency Rooms Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 1999; 50(12): 1553 - 1554. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us