Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Clardy, J. A.
* Articles by Smith, G. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Clardy, J. A.
* Articles by Smith, G. R.
Related Collections
* Outcome and Process Assessment
Psychiatr Serv 49:191-195, February 1998
© 1998 American Psychiatric Association


Article

Implementing a Statewide Outcomes Management System for Consumers of Public Mental Health Services

James A. Clardy, M.D., Brenda M. Booth, Ph.D., Leslie G. Smith, M.D., Carol R. Nordquist, M.A. and G. Richard Smith, M.D.

The authors describe the development and implementation of an outcomes management system designed to measure outcomes and processes of care for public mental health consumers in Arkansas. The public-academic project was implemented in 1995 and is based on the Shewhart-Deming model of continuous quality improvement. All 15 community mental health centers (CMHCs) in the state participate in the project, which prospectively measures longitudinal outcomes of care for the tracer conditions of major depression and schizophrenia. Multiperspective measurement tools are used to measure patients' psychiatric status and general health status at periodic intervals; information is gathered on functioning, symptoms, severity of illness, social factors, demographic characteristics, and quality of life. A problem encountered during implementation was the relatively low rate of referral of patients with the tracer conditions for monitoring. Voluntary rather than mandatory participation in the outcomes management system by the CMHCs as well as clinicians' misperceptions about the system's purpose and concerns about confidentiality may have partly accounted for the low rate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. J. Sernyak, D. Leslie, and R. Rosenheck
Use of System-Wide Outcomes Monitoring Data to Compare the Effectiveness of Atypical Neuroleptic Medications
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2003; 160(2): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. A. Adler, K. M. Bungay, D. J. Cynn, and M. Kosinski
Patient-Based Health Status Assessments in an Outpatient Psychiatry Setting
Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2000; 51(3): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
T. E. Smith, J. W. Hull, A. Hedayat-Harris, G. Ryder, and L. J. Berger
Development of a Vertically Integrated Program of Services for Persons With Schizophrenia
Psychiatr Serv, July 1, 1999; 50(7): 931 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org