Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Srebnik, D.
* Articles by Smukler, M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Srebnik, D.
* Articles by Smukler, M.
Related Collections
* Rating Scales (Nondiagnostic)
Psychiatr Serv 49:91-97, January 1998
© 1998 American Psychiatric Association


Article

Field Test of a Tool for Level-of-Care Decisions in Community Mental Health Systems

Debra Srebnik, Ph.D., Edwina Uehara, Ph.D. and Michael Smukler, M.P.A.

OBJECTIVE: Tools for supporting decisions about placing clients in different levels of mental health care can facilitate several important functions, such as structuring service allocation, providing standards for quality assurance and concurrent review, designing service and benefit packages, and planning for resource needs. This paper describes a level-of-care decision-support tool and tests its reliability and concurrent validity. METHODS: Panels of clinical managers and administrators of mental health centers developed a decision-support tool with eight levels of care and a computerized decision-tree algorithm for level-of-care placement. A random sample of 1,034 adults from one county mental health system were assessed by their case managers using a package that included variables in the eight-level model, but not the algorithm itself. Other variables were included to assess the tool's concurrent validity. RESULTS: Level-of-care placements based on the decision-support tool showed strong interrater reliability. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by significant relationships in the expected direction between level of care and psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, residential moves, homeless periods, residential independence, lack of work activity, medication noncompliance, and functioning as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary empirical evidence indicates that the level-of-care decision-support tool is reliable and valid. It could be further refined by incorporating the impact of social supports, collateral services, current mental health services, and motivation for services.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. S. Srebnik, E. Uehara, M. Smukler, J. E. Russo, K. A. Comtois, and M. Snowden
Psychometric Properties and Utility of the Problem Severity Summary for Adults With Serious Mental Illness
Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2002; 53(8): 1010 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
L. O'Malia, B. H. McFarland, S. Barker, and N. M. Barron
A Level-of-Functioning Self-Report Measure for Consumers With Severe Mental Illness
Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2002; 53(3): 326 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. Wingerson, J. Russo, R. Ries, C. Dagadakis, and P. Roy-Byrne
Use of Psychiatric Emergency Services and Enrollment Status in a Public Managed Mental Health Care Plan
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2001; 52(11): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org