Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Schade, C. P. Articles by Wittlin, B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Schade, C. P. Articles by Wittlin, B. J. Primary Care Depression

A Ten-Year Review of the Validity and Clinical Utility of Depression Screening

OBJECTIVE: Use of depression screening instruments in primary care is controversial. The authors reviewed research studies published since the development of national practice guidelines to determine whether new evidence might favor screening. The review focused on evidence-related validity and clinical utility of depression screening instruments. METHODS: Silver Platter MEDLINE was searched for English-language studies of depression screening instruments published between 1986 and 1995. Studies were classified by type—reviews of studies, outcome studies, validation studies. Results and conclusions: Fifty-nine studies met criteria for review. Validation studies were the most frequent type (39 studies) and were subclassified according to population, type of comparison, and analytical method. These studies documented the validity of screening instruments compared with formal criteria and demonstrated consistently better performance for systematic approaches compared with clinical impressions. Thirteen studies were reviews; those reviewing evidence for effectiveness disagreed in their conclusions. Only seven outcome studies related to depression screening instruments were found, and none showed measurable benefit in a screened population. Several studies showed that very brief instruments performed about as well as longer, well-validated questionnaires for screening in general populations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. D. Cohen, L. Norris, K. Acquaviva, R. A. Peterson, and P. L. Kimmel Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Depression in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1332 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Mallon, J.-E. Broman, and J. Hetta High Incidence of Diabetes in Men With Sleep Complaints or Short Sleep Duration: A 12-year follow-up study of a middle-aged population Diabetes Care, November 1, 2005; 28(11): 2762 - 2767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Blank, C. Gruman, and J. T. Robison Case-Finding for Depression in Elderly People: Balancing Ease of Administration With Validity in Varied Treatment Settings J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2004; 59(4): M378 - M384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Valenstein, S. Vijan, J. E. Zeber, K. Boehm, and A. Buttar The Cost-Utility of Screening for Depression in Primary Care Ann Intern Med, March 6, 2001; 134(5): 345 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Depression: Should We Screen Patients? Journal Watch Women's Health, February 1, 1998; 1998(201): 22 - 22. [Full Text]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us