
Psychiatr Serv 49:103-104, January 1998
© 1998 American Psychiatric Association
A Survey of County Boards' Views of Funding for Mental Retardation Versus Funding for Mental Illness
Barbara M. Rohland, M.S., M.D.
The state of Iowa mandates services for persons with mental retardation but not for those with mental illness, resulting in widely divergent spending for the two populations. Members of 98 of the 99 county boards of supervisors were interviewed to determine differences in attitudes about services and funding priorities. Respondents were more willing to provide supportive services to persons with mental retardation and acute treatment to persons with mental illness. Only 16 percent believed that persons with chronic mental illness should be a first priority for mental health funds. Respondents tended to disagree not about whether services should be funded but about who should fund them. Three-fourths believed that the state should fund such services.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Rohland and J. E. Rohrer
County Funding of Mental Health Services in a Rural State
Psychiatr Serv,
May 1, 1998;
49(5):
691 - 693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1998
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|